Skip to content
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals Sector

Secure Release Training for the Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals Sector

Modern hospitals have internal SIMRS developer teams or work with SIMRS vendors, plus BPJS, insurance, and clinical analytics integration. Patient data is specific personal data under UU PDP. Hospital developer teams need DevSecOps discipline that protects patient data from design, with evidence attachable to KARS accreditation for information governance.

  • 4.9/5 · 287 reviews
  • 300+ clients nationwide
  • 2,000+ trainers
  • 1 to hundreds of participants
  • Standard · Premium · Private 1-on-1
Request ProposalChat on WhatsApp
format
In-house / online / hybrid
duration
5 intensive days per cohort
participants
10–20 per cohort
language
Indonesian / English

2,000+ trainers and experts

Our group's teaching network, matched to what your team needs.

See class documentation

You see your trainer first

The trainer's profile, track record and field come with the proposal, before you decide.

4.9 out of 5

287 participant reviews.

300+ clients nationwide and 180,000+ private training sessions completed. Among them: MPR RI, Akademi Militer Magelang, DPRD Provinsi Jawa Timur.

One person to hundreds

Private coaching for one participant, a class for one team, or several cohorts at once.

Three budget levels

  • Standard: core class, material fitted to the participants’ work
  • Premium: senior trainer, deeper material design
  • Private 1-on-1: one participant, one trainer, schedule set by the participant
Tell us your budget
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals Sector Focus

Why Secure Software Delivery is different in Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals

Modern hospitals have internal SIMRS developer teams or work with SIMRS vendors, plus BPJS, insurance, and clinical analytics integration. Patient data is specific personal data under UU PDP. Hospital developer teams need DevSecOps discipline that protects patient data from design, with evidence attachable to KARS accreditation for information governance.

Sector KPIs
  • Hospital application coverage with SBOM
    Nearly all production internal applications
  • Critical SCA finding to production patch time
    Significant improvement after discipline matures
  • DevSecOps governance evidence for KARS
    Complete at accreditation/reaccreditation
Relevant regulations & standards
  • UU PDP No. 27/2022 — health data = specific personal data
  • UU No. 17/2023 Health Law
  • KARS Hospital Accreditation Standards
  • PMK on SIMRS and electronic medical records
  • ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + ISO 27799
  • NIST SP 800-218 SSDF
Target roles in Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
  • Head of SIMRS / Hospital IT
  • Lead Backend SIMRS
  • Hospital DevOps / SRE
  • Hospital Security Officer
  • Vendor & Procurement Manager
  • Director of Medical Support & IT
Outcomes commonly requested in Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals
  • Hospital developer teams master DevSecOps protecting patient data
  • SIMRS applications produce SBOM and signed images
  • SAST/SCA & secret scan active for internal SIMRS repositories
  • Secure-development governance evidence for KARS accreditation
  • Patient data breaches due to application defects decrease
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals-specific questions
Does the module cover external SIMRS vendor integration?
Yes. The third-party risk module covers vendor security assessment, DPA contracts, vendor SBOM obligations, and admission policy for vendor images entering the hospital cluster.
How does the material protect patient data per UU PDP?
The module covers privacy by design (DPIA, data minimization), access control, encryption, audit log, and incident notification obligations, with case exercises on medical record module development.
Can the training align with KARS?
Yes. Training & pipeline discipline evidence is prepared to attach to KARS information governance standards as hospital readiness evidence.

Quick Answer

DevSecOps Foundations training is an in-house program equipping engineering, AppSec, and operations teams to integrate security into CI/CD (shift-left, SAST/DAST/SCA, SBOM, image signing, supply-chain), guided by NIST SP 800-218 SSDF, OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM), and SLSA framework so releases stay fast and posture stays preserved.

Free Consultation

Guided by industry-recognized DevSecOps frameworks

The material follows NIST SP 800-218 Secure Software Development Framework (2022), OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM), SLSA framework levels 1–4, OWASP ASVS 4.0, and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.8.25–A.8.28 (secure development): frameworks referenced by global auditors & regulators.

Log4Shell, SolarWinds, XZ lessons: supply-chain is real

Log4Shell (CVE-2021-44228) in December 2021 hit thousands of organizations because of widespread Java library use. SolarWinds (2020) compromised a trusted vendor's build pipeline. XZ Utils backdoor (CVE-2024-3094) showed long-term social engineering of maintainers. Without SBOM, image signing, and supply-chain discipline, organizations respond to these incidents in weeks instead of hours.

Healthy adoption pattern: paved-road + champion network

Successful DevSecOps adoption across many teams typically rests on a paved-road curated by AppSec/Platform (default SAST/SCA, default image signing) + AppSec champion network in every engineering team. Centralized AppSec shifts from bottleneck reviewer to enabler & escalation.

Clients & Documentation

Some of the institutions we have trained

Photos from sessions we have delivered, each one named after the institution it belongs to.

See class documentation (123 photos)

Secure Software Delivery

DevSecOps is the practice of integrating security into the DevOps lifecycle from the earliest phase (shift-left). It covers threat modelling, SAST/DAST/SCA, secret scanning, container & IaC scanning, SBOM, image signing, and runtime security, mapped to NIST SP 800-218 Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF), OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM), and SLSA framework levels 1–4, so teams release fast without sacrificing an auditable security posture.

1Designed via training needs analysis (TNA): roles (developer, AppSec, DevOps, SRE, security), stack, and DSOMM maturity position
2Mapped explicitly to NIST SP 800-218 SSDF (Prepare/Protect/Produce/Respond) and SLSA framework levels 1–4
3Concrete shift-left approach: threat modelling + SAST + SCA in dev pipeline, DAST in staging, runtime in production
4Software supply chain management: SBOM (CycloneDX / SPDX), image signing (cosign / Sigstore), provenance attestation
5Lessons from major incidents: SolarWinds (2020), Log4Shell (CVE-2021-44228), XZ Utils backdoor (CVE-2024-3094)
6Aligned with audit obligations: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (A.8.25-A.8.28 secure development), POJK 11/POJK.03/2022 (banks), UU PDP No. 27/2022
7References we work from: NIST SP 800-218 SSDF, the OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM), and the SLSA framework for securing the software supply chain.

Measurable Outcomes

Expected Outcomes

Indicators mapped to Kirkpatrick levels and OWASP DSOMM maturity: qualitative targets, set during TNA against your team baseline.

Security discipline understood across the team
Most participants pass shift-left, basic threat modelling, and SAST/DAST/SCA/SBOM flow assessment. Judged through an assessment of the security check flow closing the class (Kirkpatrick L2).
A release pipeline proven secure
Team CI/CD integrates SAST + SCA + secret scanning, with break-build policy for high severity. Seen in the team own pipeline being re-run together (Kirkpatrick L3).
The component list and its evidence exist
Build produces SBOM (CycloneDX/SPDX) stored, images signed via cosign, and provenance attestation available.
Team maturity position is measurable
Team maps starting position on DSOMM dimensions (Build & Deployment, Culture & Org, Implementation, Information Gathering, Test & Verification) and builds gap-closing roadmap.
Development practice matches the official baseline
Team development activities mapped to 4 SSDF groups (Prepare Organization, Protect Software, Produce Well-Secured Software, Respond to Vulnerabilities).
Ready for audits and incidents
Security activity evidence documented for ISO 27001 audit, and supply-chain incident response playbook available.

Program Format

Program Format Options

Chosen by team's DSOMM maturity position, finalized after TNA. One engineering team can already set up its first pipeline inside those five days. Organizations with many teams normally attach a two to three month phased programme so the pattern spreads and the new habits hold.

1

DevSecOps Foundations Bootcamp (4–5 days)

Intensive bootcamp: shift-left, threat modelling, SAST/DAST/SCA/secret scanning, container & IaC scanning, SBOM, image signing, runtime security. Hands-on in lab pipeline.

Best for: Teams starting DevSecOps seriously (early DSOMM position)
2

Supply-Chain Security Deep Dive

Deep workshop: SLSA framework levels 1–4, SBOM (CycloneDX/SPDX), in-toto attestation, cosign signing + verification policy, and lessons from SolarWinds/Log4Shell/XZ incidents.

Best for: Teams facing supply-chain demands (regulators, enterprise clients, executive-order equivalents)
3

Pipeline Hardening & Policy as Code Workshop

Consultative session applying SAST/SCA/DAST in real pipeline + policy as code (Open Policy Agent / Conftest) for break-build and promote control.

Best for: Teams with existing CI/CD but security not yet consistently integrated
4

Recurring AppSec Champion & Maturity Program

Recurring program: AppSec champion network, tabletop sessions, finding reviews, and DSOMM reassessment for sustained maturity growth.

Best for: Multi-team engineering organizations wanting to sustain momentum

Free Consultation

Discuss your engineering team's DevSecOps plan

We map stack, roles, OWASP DSOMM maturity position, and your audit obligations, then build a proposal and budget based on real needs.

Request Proposal

Curriculum

Curriculum Framework

Designed via ADDIE; final modules curated by stack & maturity position from TNA. Topics below represent full coverage.

  • DevSecOps definition: security integrated into DevOps lifecycle from design (shift-left)
  • Defect cost multiplies when found late: the economic rationale for shift-left
  • NIST SP 800-218 SSDF: 4 groups PO/PS/PW/RV; aligned with the 2022 SSDF release
  • OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM): 5 dimensions & 4 maturity levels
  • Mature tooling: SAST (Semgrep, SonarQube), SCA (Snyk, Dependabot), DAST (OWASP ZAP), secret scan (Gitleaks, TruffleHog)

  • Threat modelling: STRIDE, PASTA, LINDDUN; when each is relevant
  • Architecture review: data flow diagram, trust boundary, abuse case
  • Secure design patterns: defense in depth, least privilege, secure defaults
  • OWASP Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS) 4.0 as security requirement
  • Privacy by design aligned with UU PDP No. 27/2022 and DPIA

  • SAST: taint analysis & data flow principles; tooling (Semgrep, SonarQube, Checkmarx)
  • SAST integration to pre-commit, PR check, and break-build policy
  • DAST: testing running applications; OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite in pipeline & manual
  • IAST & RASP: when they make sense as complements
  • OWASP Top 10 2021 as finding checklist + developer discussion language

  • SCA: open-source dependency vulnerability detection (Snyk, Dependabot, Renovate)
  • SBOM: CycloneDX & SPDX formats; generation at build time (syft, trivy)
  • Image signing & verification: cosign + Sigstore, admission policy (Kyverno/Gatekeeper)
  • SLSA framework: levels 1–4 for build pipeline integrity
  • Lessons from incidents: SolarWinds (2020), Log4Shell CVE-2021-44228 (December 2021), XZ Utils backdoor CVE-2024-3094 (2024)

  • Container security: image scanning (Trivy, Grype), minimal base image (distroless), root vs non-root
  • IaC scanning: Checkov, tfsec, KICS for Terraform / CloudFormation / ARM / Bicep
  • Kubernetes manifest scanning + admission policy (Gatekeeper / Kyverno)
  • Secret management: External Secrets + Vault / AWS Secrets Manager / Azure Key Vault / GCP Secret Manager
  • Cloud security posture management (CSPM): AWS Security Hub / Defender for Cloud / SCC

  • Runtime detection: Falco, eBPF basics; container anomaly detection
  • Logging & audit: cloud audit log, Kubernetes audit log, centralized to SIEM
  • Incident response: NIST SP 800-61 Rev 3 (2024) IR framework; tabletop exercise
  • Bug bounty & responsible disclosure: internal program vs platform (HackerOne, Bugcrowd)
  • Internal incident lessons: blameless post-mortems usable for maturity uplift

  • Mapping to ISO/IEC 27001:2022: A.8.25 secure development life cycle, A.8.26 application security requirements, A.8.27 secure system architecture, A.8.28 secure coding
  • Mapping to POJK 11/POJK.03/2022 and SEOJK 29/SEOJK.03/2022 for banks
  • UU PDP No. 27/2022 for applications processing personal data
  • OWASP DSOMM assessment and gap-closing roadmap per dimension
  • Policy as code: Open Policy Agent (OPA), Conftest, Kyverno for break-build & promote

Comparison

Choosing the Program Format

Concise decision matrix. Final recommendation set after training needs analysis.

AspectDevSecOps Foundations BootcampSupply-Chain Security Deep DivePipeline Hardening & Policy as CodeRecurring AppSec Champion & Maturity
Primary goalTeam shift-left foundationSLSA + SBOM + signing readinessConsistent pipeline integrationSustained maturity uplift
Ideal participantsTeams starting DevSecOpsTeams facing supply-chain demandsTeams with CI/CD, lacking integrationMulti-team engineering & champions
Typical duration4–5 intensive days2–3 day workshop1–2 week consultingMonthly / quarterly
Main outputFundamentals mastery + labsSBOM + signed image + playbookPipeline + policy as codeChampions + DSOMM up
Core frameworkNIST SSDF + OWASP DSOMM basicsSLSA + SBOM CycloneDX/SPDXOPA Gatekeeper + ISO 27001 A.8.xDSOMM cycle + Kirkpatrick

For Whom

Who This Program Is For

Designed by role because DevSecOps challenges differ for developer vs AppSec vs operations.

Software Developer / Engineer

Teams writing code, most effective at fixing vulnerabilities when they're still cheap.

Common challenges

  • SAST/SCA findings pile up; no priority clarity; no shared severity language
  • Secrets accidentally committed; secret scan only active after the incident
  • Threat modelling not yet part of design; vulnerabilities found at audit / pen-test

Application Security (AppSec)

Teams supporting developers to maintain security posture.

Common challenges

  • Hard to scale security reviews to dozens of teams; acts as bottleneck
  • No AppSec champion network in developer teams yet
  • No maturity baseline (DSOMM) reportable to leadership

DevOps / Build Engineer / SRE

Teams designing CI/CD pipelines and running runtime.

Common challenges

  • CI/CD pipeline not yet integrated with SAST/SCA/DAST as standard
  • SBOM not generated; images not signed; no supply-chain attestation
  • Runtime security still reactive; no container anomaly detection

Security Engineer / Security Architect

Teams setting security policy and maintaining organization posture.

Common challenges

  • Security control mapping to frameworks (NIST SSDF, ISO 27001:2022) not yet formal
  • Major incident lessons (Log4Shell, SolarWinds, XZ) not translated to playbooks
  • No policy as code automatically executed in pipeline

CTO / VP Engineering / Head of Eng

Owner of DevSecOps investment decisions and posture accountability.

Common challenges

  • Maturity position unknown; security investment unfocused
  • No security KPIs reportable to board / regulator
  • ISO 27001 / POJK audits raise repeated findings

Industry Context

Industry Applications

One specific use case per industry, naming relevant workflows, regulations, and DevSecOps patterns.

Banking & Financial Services

DevSecOps pipeline for bank digital services (internet banking, mobile, API channels) with integrated SAST/SCA/DAST, SBOM per build, signed images, and security activity evidence usable for OJK examinations (POJK 11/POJK.03/2022, SEOJK 29/SEOJK.03/2022).

See in Banking & Financial Services context →
Technology & Startups

DevSecOps platform for fast-growing technology companies, so all engineering teams deploy safely without making AppSec a bottleneck, with AppSec champion network and policy as code.

See in Technology & Startups context →
State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN)

Holding-level DevSecOps standard across BUMN subsidiaries with uniform security baseline, standard SBOM, and secure-development evidence usable for SPI/BPK and aligned with AKHLAK 'Amanah & Kompeten'.

See in State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) context →
Government & Public Sector

Secure development of digital public service applications (SPBE) with SBOM, signing, and pipeline access controls accountable to BSSN, the Inspectorate, and the public, aligned with UU PDP.

See in Government & Public Sector context →
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals

Secure development of hospital applications (SIMRS, BPJS integration module, electronic medical record module) with pipeline controls that protect patient data (UU PDP specific data) and are KARS-ready.

Energy & Resources

DevSecOps for corporate applications & support systems in the energy sector (oil & gas, power) with OT/IT boundary controls, so application changes don't become an entry vector to critical operational systems.

See in Energy & Resources context →

Delivery Method

Delivery

Format adapts to your engineering team distribution; all formats hands-on in lab pipeline.

On-site intensive & workshop

Facilitator comes to your office for a 4–5 day bootcamp; labs in practice repositories + integration to your internal pipeline (NDA applies).

Live online + managed labs

Interactive classes via Zoom/Teams; labs run on GitHub/GitLab sandbox + lab container registry provided by Neksus.

Hybrid

On-site for consultative modules (pipeline hardening, policy as code), online for concept & lab modules. Suits multi-location teams.

Scheduling fits team release & on-call calendar
Materials & labs localized to your stack (GitHub Actions / GitLab CI / Jenkins / Azure DevOps)
Lab repositories provided; option to integrate to internal non-production repo available
Participation certificate + position map against OWASP DSOMM
Evaluation report & prioritized recommendations for security / engineering leadership

Engagement Flow

Engagement Path

Follows ADDIE + NIST SSDF Prepare/Protect/Produce/Respond: qualitative durations, scaled to DSOMM position.

1

Training Needs Analysis & DSOMM Position

Mapping stack (GitHub/GitLab/Jenkins/Azure DevOps), roles, OWASP DSOMM position, existing SAST/SCA tooling, measurement baseline, and audit obligations.

Initial stage
2

Program Design by Role (ADDIE)

Drafting measurable learning objectives, role-based syllabi (developer/AppSec/DevOps/security), pipeline lab scenarios, and framework map to NIST SSDF + ISO 27001.

Pre-delivery
3

DevSecOps Foundations Bootcamp

Core 4–5 day session: shift-left, threat modelling, SAST/DAST/SCA/secret scan, container & IaC scanning, SBOM, image signing, runtime security. Hands-on in lab pipeline.

Core week
4

Pipeline Hardening & Policy as Code

Consultative session applying SAST/SCA/DAST in team pipeline + policy as code (OPA/Conftest/Kyverno) for break-build and promote control.

Rolling per team
5

Supply-Chain & SBOM Roll-out

SLSA levels 2-3 workshop + per-build SBOM (CycloneDX/SPDX) + image signing with cosign + admission policy verifying signature.

Rolling per repository
6

Champion, Tabletop & Recurring Evaluation

Active AppSec champion network, supply-chain incident tabletop, DSOMM reassessment, Kirkpatrick L1–L4 evaluation (Phillips L5 on request).

Recurring & continuous

Case Studies

Typical Outcome Patterns

Illustrative patterns based on similar program structures. No named clients or promised numbers. NIST SSDF, OWASP DSOMM, SLSA, and SolarWinds/Log4Shell/XZ incidents are attributed as external sources (NIST, OWASP Foundation, Linux Foundation OpenSSF, MITRE CVE).

Financial institution with many digital channel repositories

Intervention

Bootcamp + pipeline hardening + SBOM + image signing + champion network

Result

Per-release secure-development evidence available; supply-chain traceable during major CVE incidents

Technology company with dozens of engineering teams

Intervention

OWASP DSOMM maturity assessment + paved-road pipeline + champion network

Result

DSOMM position rises consistently, centralized AppSec shifts to enabler role, releases don't slow

Government agency running SPBE

Intervention

Bootcamp + SBOM & secure SDLC workshop + BSSN/SPBE documentation

Result

Secure-development evidence available for SPBE Index; public service applications measurably hardened

Procurement Info

Information for Procurement & Vendor Management

What procurement, finance, legal, and information security teams need.

Proposal

Structured proposal: measurable learning objectives, role-based syllabus, framework map (NIST SP 800-218 SSDF / OWASP DSOMM / SLSA / ISO 27001:2022 A.8.25-A.8.28 / POJK / UU PDP), facilitator profile, schedule, and TNA-based cost detail.

Pricing model

TNA-based: flat per program, per session, per participant, tiered, or custom. Estimate issued after TNA is agreed.

Payment & tax

Flexible terms (DP + balance / per-batch installments); tax invoice (PPN) and PO documentation supported.

BUMN/government procurement

Familiar with BUMN/government procurement: vendor documentation, e-procurement / SPSE, HPS/offers, and compliance clauses.

Measurement

Kirkpatrick L1–L3 evaluation reports (attendance, knowledge assessment, pipeline behavior) + OWASP DSOMM position map; Phillips ROI L5 on finance/risk request.

Confidentiality & data security

NDA signing, confidentiality of code & pipeline configurations used as case studies, and practices aligned with UU PDP and your internal security policy.

Material ownership

Pipeline references, policy-as-code templates, and documents built for your company are yours; usage rights of training materials are agreed in the contract.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

DevOps focuses on software delivery speed (code → production). DevSecOps adds security deliberately throughout the DevOps lifecycle (shift-left): threat modelling from design, SAST/SCA in pipeline, DAST in staging, runtime security in production, and auditable governance. The goal: speed stays high, security posture isn't sacrificed.

NIST SP 800-218 Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF) is a secure-development practice framework released by NIST since 2022. Its 4 groups (Prepare the Organization / Protect the Software / Produce Well-Secured Software / Respond to Vulnerabilities) have become a global reference, including US Executive Order 14028 requirements. Indonesian corporates use it because auditors (ISO 27001, SOC 2, OJK) increasingly ask about SSDF compliance as the gold standard for secure SDLC.

DSOMM is OWASP's maturity model assessing organization position on 5 dimensions (Build & Deployment, Culture & Org, Implementation, Information Gathering, Test & Verification) with 4 maturity levels. We use it as a common language for starting position, target, and gap-closing roadmap across annual cycles.

SLSA (Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts) is an OpenSSF framework for build pipeline integrity with 4 levels: 1 (build documentation), 2 (versioned source, hosted build, provenance), 3 (hardened build platform, non-falsifiable provenance), 4 (hermetic, two-party review). Most corporates target levels 2-3 in 1-2 years. Level 4 is for high-demand contexts (defense, cryptocurrency, critical infrastructure).

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) is a complete list of components & dependencies in software, with common formats CycloneDX (OWASP) and SPDX (Linux Foundation). During major incidents (Log4Shell, XZ Utils), organizations with SBOM can answer 'which applications are affected?' in hours. Without SBOM, the answer can take days or weeks. For corporates with many applications, standard per-release SBOM is investment that pays off at the first incident.

The combination of SAST + SCA + DAST + secret scanning + container/IaC scanning covers the majority of vectors in most corporates. Additional layers (IAST/RASP, fuzzing) make sense for high-risk or mature products. What's often missed: secret scanning across full git history (going beyond the latest commits), runtime detection (Falco) for container anomalies, and SBOM actively used during incident response.

Without DevSecOps, AppSec acts as a gatekeeper that becomes a bottleneck. With DevSecOps, AppSec shifts to enabler: curating paved-road pipelines, training developer-team champion networks, and running automated policy as code. Result: engineering teams stay fast, AppSec focuses on work that really needs expertise (threat modelling, architecture review).

Log4Shell (CVE-2021-44228, December 2021): supply-chain vulnerability in a widely-used Java library; SBOM critical for fast response. SolarWinds (2020): compromise of a trusted vendor's build pipeline; signing & provenance critical. XZ Utils backdoor (CVE-2024-3094, 2024): long-term social engineering of a maintainer; supply-chain risk is more than technical. The module translates lessons into concrete controls.

A 4–5 day bootcamp for foundations + 2–3 day workshop on one real workflow. For deeper transformation, 2–3 month phased program: bootcamp → pipeline hardening → SBOM + signing → champion network → maturity assessment. Ideal batch size is 10–20 participants so labs remain effective.

We use Kirkpatrick: Level 1 (reaction), Level 2 (knowledge via assessment), Level 3 (behavior: pipelines & policies applied), Level 4 (results: tooling coverage, DSOMM position, critical finding MTTR, SBOM coverage, audit readiness). Phillips ROI Level 5 on finance request with supply-chain incident avoidance and audit cost estimates. Baseline is set during TNA.

How hands-on the exercises go decides first, since practicing on your own pipeline requires the environment, repository access, and scanner permissions arranged before the class opens. Participant seniority follows, because engineers, the application security team, and operations each take a different angle on the same flow. After that come engineer headcount, how many cohorts form and how often the class meets, whether it stops there or continues into pipeline setup coaching, labs run on your premises or remotely, plus the city hosting them. The figure arrives when the training needs analysis is complete.

One cohort holds 10 to 20 engineers, and twenty-odd people still fit, and five full days covers practice from the moment code is written to the moment the artifact ships. What often stretches preparation is the practice environment: repositories, a sample pipeline, and scanner permissions have ready before the first session. If you run more than one squad, spreading the pattern across all of them generally takes a phased programme over several months after the class.

They can be swapped. An engineering class falls flat quickly when whoever carries it is a stranger to the tooling your team touches daily. Write to the programme coordinator, who assigns an alternate validated application security instructor. Lab modules, practice pipeline configuration, and team progress notes are filed within our operations system, and the class carries on without rebuilding the environment.

Next Step

Discuss your engineering team's DevSecOps plan

We map stack, roles, OWASP DSOMM maturity position, and your audit obligations, then build a proposal and budget based on real needs.

  • Proposal, role-based syllabus, and framework map (NIST SSDF / OWASP DSOMM / SLSA / ISO 27001 / POJK)
  • Labs in lab pipeline; option to integrate to internal non-production pipeline
  • Procurement-ready documents (company profile, NPWP, NDA, PPN tax invoice)
Request a ProposalFree Consultation

Explore More

Related Topics

Pelatihan Cloud ComputingPelatihan Docker Dan KubernetesPelatihan Mlops Production Ai EngineeringKeamanan Siber Kesadaran KaryawanAgile Scrum Tim Produk

Secure Software Delivery training for your Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals team

We map stack, roles, OWASP DSOMM maturity position, and your audit obligations, then build a proposal and budget based on real needs.

  • Proposal, role-based syllabus, and framework map (NIST SSDF / OWASP DSOMM / SLSA / ISO 27001 / POJK)
  • Labs in lab pipeline; option to integrate to internal non-production pipeline
  • Procurement-ready documents (company profile, NPWP, NDA, PPN tax invoice)

Six fields to get started. Our corporate team reads and answers it.

Additional details (optional)

Add these if you already know them. Every field in this section can be left empty, and our team will cover them during the needs-analysis call.