Compliance & Risk Officer Training That Turns Rule Keepers Into Strategic Board Partners
A modern Compliance Officer carries four parallel loads: multi-regulator compliance (POJK, OJK, BI, Kominfo, Kemenkeu), integrated risk management frameworks (ISO 31000, COSO ERM 2017), anti-bribery & AML-CFT (ISO 37001, UU 8/2010), and personal data protection (UU 27/2022 PDP). The Neksus 12–14 week program builds integrated competencies for Compliance Officers, Risk Managers, and Heads of Compliance across enterprise, banking, BUMN, and regulated industries.
- 4.9/5 · 287 reviews
- 300+ clients nationwide
- 2,000+ trainers
- 1 to hundreds of participants
- Standard · Premium · Private 1-on-1
- Target audience
- Compliance Officer · Risk Manager · DPO · Head of Compliance & RiskTarget audience
- Typical duration
- 12–14 weeks (cohort)Typical duration
- Core focus
- ISO 37301 · ISO 31000 · ISO 37001 · UU PDP · AML-CFTCore focus
- Format
- Hybrid: workshop, case lab, peer-coachingFormat
2,000+ trainers and experts
Our group's teaching network, matched to what your team needs.
See class documentationYou see your trainer first
The trainer's profile, track record and field come with the proposal, before you decide.
4.9 out of 5
287 participant reviews.
300+ clients nationwide and 180,000+ private training sessions completed. Among them: MPR RI, Akademi Militer Magelang, DPRD Provinsi Jawa Timur.
One person to hundreds
Private coaching for one participant, a class for one team, or several cohorts at once.
Three budget levels
- Standard: core class, material fitted to the participants’ work
- Premium: senior trainer, deeper material design
- Private 1-on-1: one participant, one trainer, schedule set by the participant
The Neksus Compliance & Risk Officer program builds five foundations: modern compliance team leadership, ISO 37301:2021 compliance management, integrated ISO 31000:2018 + COSO ERM 2017 risk management, anti-bribery (ISO 37001:2016 ABMS) and AML-CFT (UU 8/2010, FATF), and personal data protection (UU 27/2022 PDP). Delivered as a 12–14 week cohort with workshops, case lab on the client risk register (de-identified), and weekly peer-coaching.
Why the modern Compliance & Risk Officer carries a layered regulatory load
Compliance Officer and Risk Manager roles in Indonesian enterprises have shifted from rule keeper to translator of regulation for business decisions. Four recent regulatory waves have reshaped the landscape: UU 27/2022 Personal Data Protection (fully effective October 2024), POJK 17/2023 on Bank Risk Management, Ministry of SOE Regulation PER-2/MBU/03/2023 on Governance and Significant Corporate Activities of SOEs, and the Anti-Corruption Law revision + KPK UKAP strengthening. At the same time, international standards have matured: ISO 37301:2021 Compliance Management has replaced ISO 19600; ISO 37001:2016 ABMS is now the anti-bribery reference; ISO 31000:2018 + COSO ERM 2017 form the dual-frame for integrated risk management. A modern Compliance & Risk Officer owns the compliance program, the risk register, the mitigation plan, and risk communication to the board. The Neksus program integrates all five domains in a single cohort with a case lab drawn from the client risk register (de-identified).
- ISO 37301:2021 has replaced ISO 19600:2014 as the compliance management standard; many enterprises still hold the older certification
- ISO 37001:2016 ABMS (Anti-Bribery Management System) is mandatory for BUMN and strongly recommended for listed issuers
- ISO 31000:2018 + COSO ERM 2017 form the dual-frame for risk management; ISO for process, COSO for strategic alignment
- UU 27/2022 PDP is fully effective from October 2024 with administrative sanctions up to 2% of annual revenue
- FATF / AML-CFT (UU 8/2010) continues to tighten; FATF assessments of Indonesia shape country risk ratings
The strongest internal auditor is often promoted to Compliance Officer with zero framework for the new role. The result: compliance only surfaces when an external audit arrives, the risk register is filled once a year for the annual report, and the board fails to see compliance as a strategic partner. GRC Pundit 2024 research lists 'reactive compliance' as the #1 driver of regulator sanctions in Southeast Asian banking.
Neksus modules integrate ISO 37301:2021 Compliance Management, ISO 37001:2016 ABMS, ISO 31000:2018 + COSO ERM 2017, UU 27/2022 PDP + Kominfo regulations, Ministry of SOE Regulation PER-2/MBU/03/2023 (for BUMN), POJK 17/2023 (for banking), the Anti-Corruption Law (UU 31/1999 jo 20/2001) + KPK UKAP, and FATF Recommendations + UU 8/2010 AML-CFT. Team leadership follows the GRC Capability Model 3.0 and the IIA Three Lines Model.
Compliance breach rate, risk register coverage, control effectiveness rating, and time-to-remediation are numbers that can be tracked quarterly. A Compliance Officer who leads without a numeric baseline leads on assumption. The Neksus program begins with baselining four compliance KPIs: breach rate, risk coverage, control effectiveness, and remediation cycle time.
Modern boards and Audit Committees in Indonesia are now familiar with COSO ERM, ISO 37301, and the Three Lines Model. A Compliance Officer fluent in risk appetite, compliance maturity, and integrated assurance speaks on the same wavelength as the Audit Committee and commissioners.
The TNA pattern we most often find in Compliance & Risk Officers
These patterns emerge consistently from initial Neksus diagnostics across banking, BUMN, insurance, securities, and listed enterprises.
Symptom: Compliance only surfaces during external audits or regulator visits; no annual compliance calendar exists; internal training is absent or a formality.
Business impact: Regulator sanctions recur; corporate reputation in the regulator's eyes deteriorates; the cost of reactive compliance runs much higher.
Symptom: The risk register is filled during the annual report; no quarterly updates exist; mitigation actions carry no owner or due date.
Business impact: Emerging risks go untracked; the board makes strategic decisions without a risk lens; the risk appetite statement is absent.
Symptom: A Data Protection Officer (DPO) is appointed in name yet has limited independence; ROPA (Record of Processing Activities) is missing; DPIAs are not routine.
Business impact: PDP administrative sanction risk up to 2% of annual revenue; customer trust erodes; data breach incidents become hard to handle.
Symptom: ISO 37001 certification is renewed annually; the whistleblowing channel exists yet stays unused; vendor due diligence is formal.
Business impact: For BUMN: KPK / BPK findings related to vendor fraud; for enterprises: integrity risk remains undetected until it becomes a major incident.
Symptom: First line (operations) feels compliance is none of their concern; second line (compliance/risk) is overloaded; third line (internal audit) runs only formal compliance audits.
Business impact: Compliance ownership remains unspread; second line becomes the bottleneck; external audits find deficiencies that first line should have caught.
Symptom: A newly promoted Compliance Officer still dominates technical compliance decisions; staff get no room to grow.
Business impact: Senior compliance analysts fail to progress; the team becomes single-point-of-failure dependent; succession stalls.
Pain points Compliance & Risk Officers feel on the ground
Root: Compliance only surfaces when problems arise; the conversational language stays too legal/regulatory; no risk appetite statement exists.
What we do: The 'Compliance as Business Partner' module installs a board-defensible risk appetite statement, risk-vs-opportunity calibration with the COSO ERM framework, and risk storytelling using the Minto Pyramid structure.
Root: The compliance program is reactive; there is no ISO 37301-based compliance calendar; a remediation tracker is absent.
What we do: The 'Living Compliance Program' module installs an ISO 37301:2021 compliance calendar design, sector-specific control mapping, and a remediation tracker with accountability.
Root: The DPO is appointed without an independence statement; ROPA + DPIA are missing; vendor processing agreements remain un-updated.
What we do: The 'UU 27/2022 PDP Implementation' module installs a DPO independence policy, ROPA template, DPIA workflow, vendor data processing agreement, and an incident response playbook for data breach.
Root: The risk register is only updated once a year; no heat map exists; mitigation actions carry no owner.
What we do: The 'Risk Register that Lives' module installs a quarterly review cadence, a likelihood × impact heat map, mitigation actions with RACI, and integration into business decisions.
Root: ISO 37001 ABMS runs as a formality; the whistleblowing channel is under-utilized; vendor due diligence is not risk-based.
What we do: The 'Living ABMS' module installs risk-based vendor due diligence, whistleblowing channel governance (anonymity, non-retaliation, investigation playbook), and an integrity risk dashboard.
Root: First line gets no compliance self-assessment toolkit; second line is overloaded; third line plays police, with trust kept low.
What we do: The 'Three Lines Activation' module installs a first-line self-assessment toolkit, a second-line advisor role, a third-line integrated assurance plan, and a quarterly governance forum.
The Compliance & Risk Officer capability ladder — first 14 months
Each stage lists the core competencies and the KPI signal that the next stage is ready to enter.
- Internalize the shift from internal auditor to leader of a compliance team
- Map the stakeholder graph: Board, Audit Committee, Risk Committee, regulators, internal audit, business units
- Establish weekly 1-on-1 with every member of the compliance/risk team
- Instrument a baseline of four KPIs: breach rate, risk coverage, control effectiveness, remediation cycle time
- Build an ISO 37301:2021 compliance program (compliance calendar, control mapping, training plan)
- Design an ISO 31000:2018 risk management framework with a COSO ERM strategic overlay
- Activate the Three Lines Model — first-line self-assessment, second-line advisor, third-line integrated assurance
- Author a board-defensible risk appetite statement
- Operationalize ISO 37001 ABMS — risk-based due diligence, whistleblowing channel governance
- Lead AML-CFT compliance (UU 8/2010, FATF Recommendations) — enhanced KYC, suspicious transaction reporting
- Implement UU 27/2022 PDP — DPO independence, ROPA, DPIA, vendor DPA, incident response
- Build an integrated assurance plan across domains (compliance + risk + audit)
- Design a dual-track compliance career ladder (technical compliance + risk leadership)
- Build the compliance operating cadence: monthly risk review, quarterly compliance review, annual ERM update, regulator engagement calendar
- Present the risk register and compliance posture to the Audit Committee + commissioners with storytelling
- Prepare a successor (manager-once-removed thinking)
KPIs that should shift while this program runs
Pick 3–5 KPIs from the list before the program starts so impact is measured with consistent numbers.
The most sensitive indicator of compliance program health.
Unregistered risks go unmitigated; coverage is the prerequisite for risk governance.
Evidence that the compliance program is alive, with documentation as a supporting layer.
Indicator of the compliance team's responsiveness to external findings.
An under-utilized channel signals a weak integrity culture; over-utilization without closure collapses trust.
The direct Compliance Officer is the #1 factor in senior compliance analyst retention.
A great Compliance Officer builds the next Compliance Officer.
Three-day workshop vs 12–14 week cohort vs embedded coaching
Three intervention shapes with distinct ROI profiles. The 12–14 week cohort is the Neksus default recommendation for Compliance & Risk Officers.
| Criterion | Three-day workshop | 12–14 week cohort ★ | Embedded coaching |
|---|---|---|---|
| Budget level | Standard | Standard or Premium | Premium, or Private 1-on-1 for the CCO |
| Case lab on client risk register (de-identified) | None | Yes — 30-day working case | Yes — 90-day deep engagement |
| Scalability to 15+ Compliance Officers | High — parallel cohorts | High in cohort format | Low — limited by senior coach capacity |
| Practice on real regulator engagement | None | Yes — assignments + live audit simulation | Yes — every regulator engagement during the engagement |
| Best fit | ISO 37301 / UU PDP awareness for the board | Default for Compliance Officers and Risk Managers | Head of Compliance / Chief Risk Officer transitioning to a C-level role |
The 12–14 week engagement flow — from kickoff to sustaining
- 1
Diagnostic and compliance assessment
Week 0Online pre-assessment (ISO 37301 maturity, ISO 31000 + COSO ERM self-assessment, UU PDP readiness check, ABMS utilization audit) plus 1:1 interview with every participant plus a walkthrough of the client risk register + compliance calendar. Output: compliance KPI baseline + team capability heatmap.
- 2
Three-day onsite kickoff workshop
Weeks 1–2Day 1: Compliance Officer role identity + ISO 37301:2021 foundation + Three Lines Model. Day 2: ISO 31000 + COSO ERM 2017 integrated risk framework + risk appetite statement. Day 3: UU 27/2022 PDP + ISO 37001 ABMS + AML-CFT compliance. Assignment: each participant drafts a 90-day plan.
- 3
Case lab on client risk register (de-identified)
Weeks 2–4The Neksus team plus the client Compliance Officer work on the client risk register (de-identified) to: identify 5 high-risks yet unmitigated, design a quarterly review cadence, and draft a risk appetite statement for the board.
- 4
Thematic live workshops (bi-weekly, 3 hours)
Weeks 3–12Rolling topics: Living Compliance Program (ISO 37301), Risk Register that Lives, UU PDP Implementation Deep Dive, Living ABMS, Three Lines Activation, Regulator Engagement Playbook. Each session ends with a two-week practice assignment.
- 5
Peer-coaching pods (four officers per pod)
Weeks 3–13Weekly 60-minute sessions between participants with a peer-coaching frame (problem framing, GROW peer-questioning, accountability check). A Neksus coach facilitates the first three sessions remotely; the pod runs self-managed afterwards.
- 6
Mid-program check-in with Director of Compliance / CRO
Week 7Participants plus Director of Compliance/CRO plus a Neksus coach in a 60-minute session. Review the 90-day plan, compliance KPI baseline, and calibrate compliance maturity uplift expectations.
- 7
Capstone presentation — compliance org transformation
Week 13Each participant presents: baseline four compliance KPIs → 90-day target, one compliance program brought to life (ISO 37301), one risk register quarterly review already running, one UU PDP gap closed, and the career ladder plan for the team.
- 8
Sustaining: quarterly clinic + regulator engagement review
Week 14 → 12 monthsA 90-minute quarterly clinic with a Neksus coach to work through live cases (new regulation, upcoming audit, incident response). Access to the Compliance Officer Indonesia alumni network.
Decision-makers in a compliance & risk leadership program
Five stakeholder rings that must align before the program succeeds.
Justifies the compliance program ROI, connects it to the corporate GRC roadmap, and secures regulator engagement readiness.
Compliance maturity consistency, a readable ERM dashboard, and an annual integrated assurance plan.
Three Lines Model coordination, audit-plan integration with the compliance program, and hand-off of findings into the remediation tracker.
Operational logistics, Kirkpatrick evaluation, LMS integration, and reporting up to the CHRO.
UU PDP implementation coordination, vendor DPA, incident response playbook, and regulator engagement (Kominfo, OJK).
Vendor scoring, contracting, e-procurement (BUMN/government via SPSE LKPP) for multi-cohort engagement.
Design notes — why we built it this way
- Hybrid format (live + case lab + async)50% live cohort, 30% case lab on client risk register (de-identified), 20% async assignmentCompliance leadership demands practice on a real risk register. Theory workshops without a case lab create awareness that evaporates within 30 days.
- Cohort size8–12 Compliance & Risk Officers per cohortSmall enough for deep case lab and confidential discussion, large enough for cross-sector diversity (banking, BUMN, insurance, listed enterprises).
- Total duration12–14 weeks (ISO 37301 + ISO 31000 + ABMS + UU PDP modules need repeated practice)Kirkpatrick L3 research shows meaningful impact emerges after at least 8 weeks of practice with feedback; compliance leadership adds extra latency so one quarterly risk review + regulator engagement cycle can run.
- Facilitator profileFacilitators with at least 12 years of field compliance/risk leadership experience plus one credential of ICA, CRMA, CISA, or ISO 37301 / ISO 31000 Lead ImplementerField experience earns credibility; the professional credential enforces methodological discipline.
- Language of deliveryBahasa Indonesia (default) — compliance + risk discussion stays sensitive and needs nuance; bilingual ID/EN for multinational corporates with regional CRO callsRisk + compliance judgment discussion runs deeper in the mother tongue; ISO/COSO jargon stays in its original language.
- Effectiveness measurementKirkpatrick L1 (satisfaction) + L2 (competency) + L3 (behavior, 3 months post) + L4 (breach rate + risk coverage + remediation cycle time, 6 months post)L4 for compliance leadership is clearly measurable via compliance KPIs; a compliance leadership program has a transparent source of impact evidence.
Neksus topics most often paired with a Compliance & Risk Officer program
Employee Cybersecurity Awareness
UU PDP + ISO 27001 require Compliance Officers to lead security awareness within their teams. This module trains them to design and roll out a corporate cybersecurity awareness program.
Data Literacy & Business Analytics
Modern ERM dashboards and compliance reporting require data literacy. This module accelerates compliance's transition from spreadsheet-based to evidence-based reporting.
Executive Communication & Presentation
Compliance Officers must present the risk register and compliance posture to the Audit Committee. The Minto Pyramid + Storytelling with Data module trains them to speak in commissioner language.
Business Negotiation & Influence
Compliance Officers must negotiate mitigation actions with business units, scope with regulators, and budget with the CFO. This module trains influencing without formal authority.
Organizational Change Management
Compliance transformation is always met with operational resistance. The Kotter / ADKAR module equips Compliance Officers as regulatory change translators to operational stakeholders.
Procurement information
- Contract formatInhouse fixed cohort (12–14 weeks), multi-cohort continuous program (2–3 cohorts per year), or long-term engagement (12 months with periodic refresh + quarterly clinic).
- LocationOnsite at client offices, regional onsite for multi-city BUMN, hybrid (onsite kickoff + bi-weekly online sessions), or fully online.
- Language of deliveryBahasa Indonesia (default); bilingual ID/EN for multinational corporates with regional CRO calls.
- Participant materials and certificateModules, workbook, risk register + compliance calendar + DPIA + ROPA + risk appetite statement + RACI templates, 12-month access to the Compliance Officer Indonesia alumni resource hub, Neksus participation certificate. Onward certifications (ICA, CRMA, CISA, ISO Lead Implementer) available via a separate track.
- Tax documentation and e-procurementVAT (PPN) tax invoice, official receipt, BAST. Support for BUMN/government e-procurement (SPSE LKPP). Comprehensive vendor scoring document available for internal evaluation.
- Payment termsA down payment at contract signing, a milestone payment after kickoff + case lab, the balance after capstone. The size of each payment is agreed in the contract under the client's procurement rules.
- Optional add-onsPersonal 1-on-1 coaching for Director of Compliance / CRO (separate hour-based package) plus a 90-minute executive briefing for Board / Audit Committee / Risk Committee on compliance capability roadmap.
- NDA and confidentialityStandard or client-specific NDA with stricter confidentiality clauses (compliance datasets are highly sensitive); the Neksus team is accustomed to working with confidential risk registers from banking, BUMN, insurance, and listed enterprises.
Frequently Asked Questions
Let's design the Compliance & Risk Officer cohort for your team
Send the number of Compliance Officers / Risk Managers, the sector + regulations involved (POJK, Permen BUMN, UU PDP), and your target cohort start date. The Neksus team studies your context and prepares a tailored program design.
- 12–14 week cohort with workshop + risk register case lab + peer-coaching
- Facilitators with field compliance/risk leadership experience plus ICA / CRMA / CISA / ISO Lead Implementer credentials
- Mid-program check-in with the Director of Compliance/CRO so participant 90-day plans land with board support
- Kirkpatrick L1–L4 measurement using breach rate + risk coverage + remediation cycle time
- Bahasa Indonesia / bilingual ID-EN delivery, with materials audit-ready for OJK / BPK / KPK / Kominfo