Language & Communication

Business English Training

Q: Is there a placement test, and which instrument is used?

Yes. The program begins with a CEFR-based placement test (Common European Framework of Reference) so participants are grouped into a class matching their band: Basic User (A1-A2), Independent User (B1-B2), or Proficient User (C1-C2). The instrument is matched to the need: TOEIC Listening & Reading / Speaking & Writing (scores mapped to the CEFR per official ETS guidance), Cambridge Linguaskill (AI-based, focused on business situations, fast results), or Pearson Versant for a speaking focus. The same assessment is reused at the end of the cycle so level gain is compared fairly.

Q: How is this different from a general English course?

This sits outside General English. We use an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) approach, more precisely English for Occupational Purposes. That means the curriculum is built from a needs analysis and target-situation analysis: we map the real work situations a given role must master (e.g. trade-finance email, project conference calls, contract negotiation), then build the syllabus around those tasks (in place of a generic vocabulary list). The result transfers directly to the job.

Q: Is the focus grammar or work communication?

The focus is real work communication. The methods used are Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) and Communicative Language Teaching: participants complete authentic communicative tasks (writing email, leading meetings, presenting, negotiating) with meaning as the primary focus. Grammatical accuracy is still taught within task context (focus on form), in place of isolated grammar drills that fail to transfer to the job.

Q: How is progress measured and proven to management?

Progress is measured as CEFR level gain between the placement test and a re-assessment with the same instrument, plus performance on applied communicative tasks. Results are mapped to the Kirkpatrick model: Level 1 (reaction), Level 2 (learning: level gain), Level 3 (behavior: application on real work), Level 4 (results: communication-standard consistency). When finance requires a figure, impact can be raised to Phillips ROI Level 5 with isolation of training effects. A baseline is set at the TNA; we do not promise level gains we cannot prove.

Q: Which standards frameworks ground the curriculum?

The primary reference is the CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference for Languages), including the Council of Europe's Companion Volume 2020, which adds mediation scales (the ability to bridge meaning between parties, relevant for cross-cultural negotiation) and an action-oriented approach built on can-do descriptors. Instructional design follows ADDIE, the teaching methods are TBLT/CLT, and retention reinforcement follows the 70-20-10 pattern. The aim is to build measurable ability aligned to an internationally recognized framework.

Q: How does Indonesia's English-proficiency context shape the program design?

As an external reference (outside our claims), the EF English Proficiency Index 2024 places Indonesia in the low-proficiency band (score 468, ranked 80 of 116 countries), with speaking the weakest skill nationally. The implication: the program cannot assume a uniform level, so a placement test is mandatory, classes are grouped by CEFR band, and the share of productive practice (speaking & writing) is increased, because that is where the typical gap is largest.

Q: Is the curriculum genuinely customized per department?

Fully. After the needs analysis, modules, case studies, and communicative tasks are tailored per function: sales/BD (negotiation, client correspondence), engineering/operations (documentation & technical calls), finance/procurement (commercial & contract correspondence), management (strategic presentations & meetings). Sector terminology and discourse (banking, energy, logistics, manufacturing) are integrated for direct relevance to each function (replacing any uniform-template approach).

Q: What is the ideal class size and how are participants grouped?

8-12 participants per class so each person gets enough speaking turns and feedback, crucial for the communicative method. Grouping uses the CEFR band from the placement test (in place of job-title grouping), because mixed-level classes hold every participant back. For large organizations, classes are split into several cohorts per level with a rolling schedule.

Q: Will the schedule disrupt operational work hours?

Not necessarily. Online, hybrid, and flexible-schedule formats are available, built around the company's operational calendar and shifts. The 70-20-10 pattern means most reinforcement happens through short micro-learning and real-work application, so formal class time can be arranged efficiently without sacrificing results.

Q: How long until a level gain shows, and is there follow-up support?

Gaining one CEFR band (e.g. B1 to B2) typically requires hundreds of hours of meaningful exposure & practice, so programs are usually ongoing for 3-12 months depending on target and time availability. Spaced practice and micro-learning between sessions accelerate retention. Follow-up support includes application coaching, periodic reviews, a 30-60-90 day plan, and a materials & rubric bank so the communication standard holds after the program ends.

English that goes straight into email, meetings, presentations, and conversations with overseas partners. Every participant is placed on the CEFR scale from the placement test onward, then measured again at the end of the programme with recognised assessments, so you can see who moved up and by how much.

4.9/5 · 287 reviews
300+ clients nationwide
2,000+ trainers
1 to hundreds of participants
Standard · Premium · Private 1-on-1

Request Proposal Chat on WhatsApp

format: In-house / online / hybrid
duration: 6-month running programme, starting with a placement test
participants: 8-12 per class, grouped by CEFR level
language: Indonesian / English instruction

2,000+ trainers and experts

Our group's teaching network, matched to what your team needs.

See class documentation

You see your trainer first

The trainer's profile, track record and field come with the proposal, before you decide.

4.9 out of 5

287 participant reviews.

300+ clients nationwide and 180,000+ private training sessions completed. Among them: MPR RI, Akademi Militer Magelang, DPRD Provinsi Jawa Timur.

One person to hundreds

Private coaching for one participant, a class for one team, or several cohorts at once.

Three budget levels

Standard: core class, material fitted to the participants’ work
Premium: senior trainer, deeper material design
Private 1-on-1: one participant, one trainer, schedule set by the participant

Tell us your budget

Quick Answer

Professional business English training is an ongoing in-house program that builds real work communication (email, meetings, presentations, negotiation) with an English for Specific Purposes approach. The curriculum is mapped to CEFR levels (Companion Volume 2020), taught task-based, begun with a placement test, and progress is measured with TOEIC/Linguaskill/Versant assessments and the Kirkpatrick model.

Free Consultation

Curriculum mapped to a recognized framework (CEFR)

Every capability target is mapped to a CEFR level (Common European Framework of Reference, Council of Europe Companion Volume 2020, including the mediation scales & action-oriented can-do approach). Class grouping and progress evidence use the Basic/Independent/Proficient User bands (in place of any internal 'level' that resists external comparison).

Context: Indonesia in the low-proficiency band (external reference)

The EF English Proficiency Index 2024 places Indonesia in the low-proficiency band (score 468, ranked 80 of 116), with speaking the weakest nationally. This is an external benchmark (outside the status of a Neksus claim). The implication: a placement test is mandatory and the share of productive practice is increased; assuming a uniform team level is a design error.

The most common mistake: a uniform General English course with no measurement

Many programs stop at one-class-fits-all general English, with no needs analysis, no level grouping, and no before/after assessment. Without an ESP approach, the CEFR framework, and Kirkpatrick evaluation, progress is unproven and the budget is hard to defend. This program unifies needs analysis, a per-role curriculum, and level measurement.

Clients & Documentation

Some of the institutions we have trained

Photos from sessions we have delivered, each one named after the institution it belongs to.

See class documentation (123 photos)

Professional Business English

Professional business English training is an ongoing program that builds employees' work-communication ability in English for real situations: email, meetings, presentations, negotiation, and technical documents. It is designed with an English for Specific Purposes (ESP / English for Occupational Purposes) approach: it begins with a needs analysis, is mapped to CEFR levels (Common European Framework of Reference, Companion Volume 2020 including the mediation scales), is taught task-based and communicatively, and progress is measured with recognized assessments (TOEIC, Cambridge Linguaskill, Pearson Versant) and the Kirkpatrick evaluation model.

1English for Specific Purposes (ESP) approach: curriculum built from a needs analysis & target-situation analysis per role (in place of a generic General English syllabus)

2Explicitly mapped to CEFR levels A1-C2 (Companion Volume 2020): three bands Basic/Independent/Proficient User, plus mediation scales for cross-cultural contexts

3Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) & Communicative Language Teaching method: authentic communicative tasks (email, meetings, negotiation) that go beyond isolated grammar drills

4Begins with a CEFR-based placement test (TOEIC L&R/S&W, Cambridge Linguaskill, or Pearson Versant) for fair class grouping

5Curriculum customized per department via a training needs analysis: sales/BD, engineering, finance, operations, management

670-20-10 pattern with microlearning & spaced practice for retention; progress measured as CEFR level gain per cycle, mapped to Kirkpatrick

7References we work from: the English for Specific Purposes approach, the CEFR level map (Companion Volume 2020), and TOEIC, Cambridge Linguaskill, and Pearson Versant assessments for measuring progress.

Measurable Outcomes

Expected Outcomes

Success indicators mapped to Kirkpatrick/Phillips evaluation levels and CEFR band gain: qualitative targets, set jointly during the TNA against the team's baseline.

Participant language level moves up: Measurable CEFR level gain per cycle from the placement test (e.g. A2 toward B1, B1 toward B2), verified by the same re-assessment instrument. The band gain is read on the CEFR level map (Kirkpatrick L2).
Work tasks get done in English: Email, summaries, and meeting participation in English become more precise, clear, and professional on real work after training. Visible when participants write email and chair meetings in English (Kirkpatrick L3).
Confident in presentations and Q&A: Participants can structure and deliver a business presentation and handle Q&A confidently in international forums. Seen in the recorded English presentation sessions (Kirkpatrick L3).
One consistent communication standard company-wide: More uniform English communication standards across teams, translated into internal templates & rubrics usable long term. Reflected in how consistent outgoing letters are between units (Kirkpatrick L4).
Able to bridge cross-cultural meetings: Ability to bridge meaning between parties (CEFR mediation scales) in negotiation and coordination with foreign partners. Proven when a participant bridges a conversation with an overseas partner (Kirkpatrick L3).
Monetary value of the new capability (optional): Net-benefit calculation with isolation of training effects when finance requires a figure (e.g. faster English-language deal/contract cycles). A rupiah figure comes out of Phillips L5 if finance requests one.

Program Format

Program Format Options

Chosen by level distribution, urgency, and operational schedule. Finalized after the training needs analysis. Six months is the length companies take most often. A class chasing a bigger level jump can extend to twelve months, while a narrow need such as preparing one major presentation is compressed into a thematic intensive.

Placement Test & Needs Diagnostic

CEFR-based level assessment (TOEIC L&R/S&W, Cambridge Linguaskill focused on business situations, or Pearson Versant for speaking) + a per-role needs analysis. Output: a level profile + a target-situation map per department.

Best for: The first step before a program, or a team capability audit

Ongoing Program by Level

Regular classes grouped by CEFR band with an ESP task-based curriculum, micro-learning between sessions (70-20-10 pattern), and re-assessment per cycle to evidence level gain.

Best for: Medium-term capability building with measurable level targets

Thematic Intensive (Specific Skill)

Focus on one priority skill (email & correspondence, meetings & teleconference, business presentation, or negotiation & cross-cultural mediation) for an urgent, specific need.

Best for: Teams with a concrete deadline (e.g. market expansion, principal audit)

Free Consultation

Discuss your team's business English training needs

We map your roles, real communication situations, and your team's CEFR level, then build a proposal & budget estimate grounded in real needs.

Request Proposal

Curriculum

Curriculum Framework

Built with ADDIE and the ESP approach (needs analysis -> target situation -> task); final modules curated from the TNA and CEFR bands. Topics below are the full coverage that can be activated.

Reading the placement-test result: a participant's position on the CEFR band (Basic A1-A2, Independent B1-B2, Proficient C1-C2)
Realistic target level per role (e.g. functional B1 vs B2 for internationally client-facing roles)
Communication-needs diagnostic: the real work situations that must be mastered (target-situation analysis)
Self-study strategies & spaced-practice habits so ability is retained
Setting the measurement baseline jointly with the L&D team

Business email: structure, register (formal/neutral), tone, and international correspondence etiquette
Reports, executive summaries, and minutes that are concise and clear
Accurate writing: effective sentences, cohesion, and grammatical accuracy within task context (replacing the isolated grammar-drill model)
Procurement/commercial correspondence: offers, clarifications, follow-ups
An internal writing-quality rubric for post-program standardization

Leading & participating in meetings: opening, steering the agenda, summarizing
Clarifying, polite interruption, diplomatically agreeing/disagreeing
Language for online calls (Zoom/Teams): handling audio issues, turn-taking, written follow-up
Active listening & paraphrasing to confirm understanding across accents
Active listening to accent variation in English as a lingua franca

Presentation structure: signposting, transitions, and emphasizing key messages
Language for data, numbers, trends, and visuals
Handling Q&A: answering, deferring, clarifying difficult questions
Delivery: pacing, emphasis, and confidence in international forums
Record-review practice as measurable feedback

Negotiation language: proposals, concessions, conditions, and closing
CEFR mediation scales (Companion Volume 2020): bridging meaning between parties & relaying information
Diplomacy, hedging, and tone management in sensitive situations
Cross-cultural awareness: direct vs indirect communication styles, time & hierarchy expectations
Negotiation case studies from your company's business context

ESP modules per function: sales/BD, engineering/operations, finance, procurement, service
Sector terminology & discourse (e.g. banking, energy, logistics, manufacturing)
70-20-10 pattern: formal classes, guided practice, real-work application + micro-learning
Per-cycle re-assessment & Kirkpatrick L1-L4 evaluation to evidence impact
Self-sufficiency roadmap: a materials bank, rubrics, and internal language champions

Comparison

Mapping CEFR Levels to Assessments & Role Needs

Indicative mapping between CEFR bands, assessment instruments, and typical role needs. TOEIC thresholds follow official ETS guidance (per Listening/Reading section, scale 5-495); the final recommendation is set after the training needs analysis.

Aspect	Basic User (A1-A2)	Independent (B1)	Independent (B2)	Proficient User (C1-C2)
Can-do description (CEFR)	Basic phrases & sentences; simple, predictable transactions	Handles most routine work situations; simple connected text	Fluent & spontaneous interaction; clear argument; complex work topics	Flexible & precise expression; nuance of meaning; complex text
TOEIC L&R (per-section threshold, ETS)	Below B1 (L/R < 275)	L 275 / R 275	L 400 / R 385	L 490 / R 455 (C1)
IELTS / Versant equivalent (indicative)	IELTS < 4.0	IELTS 4.0-5.0	IELTS 5.5-6.5	IELTS 7.0+
Typical role need	Basic internal communication; foundation reinforcement needed	Routine email & limited meeting participation	Internationally client-facing roles, presentation, negotiation	High-level negotiation, global leadership roles
Typical curriculum focus	Foundation + spaced-practice habits	Professional email, meetings, accuracy in tasks	Presentation, negotiation, cross-cultural mediation	Refining register, nuance, complex mediation

For Whom

Who Is This Program For?

Structured per role via an ESP needs analysis, because communication tasks and target levels differ per function.

Client-facing teams (sales, business development, export)

Communicate directly with partners, prospects, and international clients via email, calls, and negotiation.

Common challenges

Email feels unprofessional or ambiguous, slowing responses
Hesitant and losing initiative during negotiation or English-language calls
Struggle to build cross-cultural rapport, affecting client trust

Technical, operations & project teams

Read/write technical documents, coordinate with principals, vendors, and global teams.

Common challenges

Hard to explain technical matters concisely and accurately in English
Passive in international meetings, so technical contribution is not conveyed
English technical documentation is prone to misinterpretation

Finance, procurement & legal/contract

Handle commercial correspondence, contracts, and communication with foreign auditors/partners.

Common challenges

Procurement correspondence & clauses easily misread if the register is wrong
Audit/foreign-principal communication demands precision and a diplomatic tone
No uniform commercial-communication register standard yet

Management, HR & L&D

Raise the organization's global communication standard and prove training impact.

Common challenges

Team capability not mapped objectively (without a CEFR framework)
Language-training results hard to prove to management/finance
Generic content not relevant to the company's real work situations

Industry Context

Use Cases by Industry

One specific use case per industry, naming a real communication situation & target level in that vertical.

Banking & Financial Services

Communication with correspondent banks, investors, and foreign auditors: trade-finance email, treasury conference calls, and performance presentations. Target Independent band (B1-B2) for internationally facing roles, with a precise commercial register.

See in Banking & Financial Services context →

Technology & Startups

Distributed global-team collaboration: English documentation & PRDs, cross-timezone daily/sprint calls, and clear asynchronous communication. Focus on cross-accent active listening and concise technical writing.

See in Technology & Startups context →

Manufacturing

Communication with foreign principals & vendors: technical specifications, quality/deviation reports, and plant audits. ESP technical modules with process terminology, plus practice explaining production issues accurately.

See in Manufacturing context →

State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN)

International-partnership, multilateral-institution, and global-forum communication: cooperation memoranda, summaries for the board, and presentations in official forums. Target levels mapped to CEFR so they are defensible in HR-development reporting.

See in State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) context →

Energy & Resources

Project communication with international contractors & EPC partners: project meetings, contract correspondence, and scope-change negotiation. Emphasis on negotiation language, hedging, and cross-cultural mediation.

See in Energy & Resources context →

Logistics & Supply Chain

Coordination with cross-border partners, agents, and clients: shipping instructions, complaint handling, and clear escalation under time pressure. Focus on concise email and firm-but-polite phone communication.

See in Logistics & Supply Chain context →

Delivery Method

Delivery

Format adapts to team distribution and operational schedule; every format is communicative & task-based with abundant speaking/writing practice throughout each session.

In-house on-site

Facilitator comes to the office or company training site; classes by level with role-play, meeting/negotiation simulation, and direct feedback.

Live online

Interactive class via Zoom/Teams with paired breakout practice, realistic teleconference simulation, session recordings, and micro-learning between sessions.

Hybrid

On-site sessions for intensive practice (presentations, negotiation) followed by online follow-up, coaching, and real-work application practice (70-20-10 pattern).

Schedule built around the company's operational calendar & shifts so work hours are not disrupted

Materials, worksheets, and a communicative-task bank prepared by the Neksus team, adapted to the company context

Placement test & re-assessment run with the same instrument so level comparison is fair

Certificate of participation noting the CEFR band for every attendee

Post-training evaluation report (level gain + Kirkpatrick) for the L&D and leadership teams

Engagement Flow

Engagement Path

From need to measurable level gain: qualitative durations, adapted to organization scale and target CEFR band.

Training Needs Analysis & Placement Test

An ESP needs analysis (real communication situations per role) + a CEFR-based placement test (TOEIC/Linguaskill/Versant). Output: a level profile + a target-situation map + a measurement baseline.

Initial stage

Program Design (ADDIE + ESP)

Defining measurable learning objectives (target CEFR band), a task-based per-role syllabus, case studies from your business context, and the re-assessment plan.

Before delivery

Class Grouping by CEFR Band

Participants grouped by band (Basic/Independent/Proficient User), in place of job-title grouping, so each class is homogeneous and every participant gets enough practice turns.

Before classes begin

Ongoing Delivery (70-20-10)

Communicative task-based classes + guided practice + real-work application, reinforced by micro-learning & spaced practice between sessions for retention.

Rolling per cycle

Re-assessment & Kirkpatrick Evaluation

Assessment with the same instrument to measure CEFR band gain; Kirkpatrick L1-L4 evaluation. Phillips ROI Level 5 if finance requires a monetized figure.

End of each cycle

Follow-up & Institutionalization

Application coaching, periodic reviews, a 30-60-90 day plan, a materials & rubric bank, and internal language champions so the communication standard holds.

Ongoing

Case Studies

Typical Outcome Patterns

Indicative impact patterns based on similar program structures. Illustrative, with no named clients or promised numbers. External benchmarks (e.g. EF EPI) are cited as industry references (outside the status of Neksus result claims).

An export-sales team across levels (Basic-Independent User), distributed population

Intervention

A CEFR-based placement test + a 6-month ongoing program, ESP curriculum focused on email & negotiation

Result

Measurable CEFR band gain per cycle for most participants; client correspondence more professional and consistent

An engineering team that frequently presents to foreign principals

Intervention

A thematic presentation & Q&A intensive + record-review practice

Result

Clearer presentation structure and more confident Q&A handling in international forums

An agency/state-owned-enterprise HR-development unit needing progress reporting

Intervention

Level assessment + a program by band + reports mapped to CEFR and Kirkpatrick

Result

Capability progress made defensible with a recognized framework, supporting HR-development reporting

Procurement Info

Information for Procurement & Vendor Management

What procurement, finance, legal, and HR-development teams need.

Proposal

Structured proposal: measurable learning objectives (target CEFR band), a role-based ESP syllabus, assessment methodology (TOEIC/Linguaskill/Versant), facilitator profiles, schedule, and a TNA-based cost breakdown.

Pricing model

TNA-based: flat per program, per session, per participant, tiered, or custom. No standard figure without a needs analysis; an estimate follows the TNA and once assessment scope is agreed.

Payment & tax

Flexible terms (deposit + balance / per-batch or per-cycle terms); tax invoice (PPN/VAT) and PO documentation support available.

BUMN/government process

Familiar with state-owned-enterprise/agency procurement stages: vendor documents, e-procurement, owner's estimate/bid, and compliance clauses; progress reporting can be mapped to the CEFR framework for HR-development accountability.

Measurement

Kirkpatrick Level 1-3 evaluation report (attendance, before/after CEFR level assessment, communicative-task performance); Phillips ROI Level 5 on finance request.

Confidentiality & participant data

NDA signing and participant data/score confidentiality clauses; individual assessment results are treated as confidential and reported in aggregate to L&D unless otherwise agreed.

Material ownership

Task banks, rubrics, and materials built specifically for the company belong to the company; training-material usage rights are agreed in the contract.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions